TOWN OF DERBY
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Minutes
 



 

*** Unapproved ***

Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment * Minutes * September 21, 2009

 

Members Present:  Paul Prue, Norman Gaboriault, Joe Profera, Judy Nommik.

 

Members Absent:  Charles Capaldi.

 

Others Present:  Julie Bronson, ZA Bob Kelley.

 

7:05 p.m.: Chair Joe Profera called the hearing to order.  Paul Prue made a motion to accept the minute of the last meeting (Jul 13) as written.  Seconded by Norman Gaboriault.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

Chair Joe Profera read the warning for application 09-115 by Julie Bronson, PIN #PATST003A6L13, for conditional use review to expand a nonconforming structure by adding a 13 ft by 19 ft sunroom.  The existing building is 12 ft from the rear lot line and the proposed addition is to be 14 ft from the rear lot line.  This property is located at 315 Dashner Circle and is in the Village Residential-One Derby Line zoning district.  Julie Bronson was present to explain the request.  The board reviewed the bylaw as it applies to this application and felt that §305 does not allow for the expansion of the footprint of the building within the required setback areas.  There were no letters submitted or oral testimony given by abutting property owners/interested parties in regards to this application.  Norman Gaboriault made a motion to close the hearing on application 09-115 by Julie Bronson.  Seconded by Judy Nommik.  Approved by a unanimous decision.  The applicant was informed that the Board has 45 days to render a decision and they will be notified when a decision has been made.

 

After deliberations Paul Prue made a motion to deny application 09-115 by Julie Bronson because §302.5 does not allow for the expansion the footprint of a nonconforming structure within the required setback areas (see attached written decision).  Seconded by Norman Gaboriault.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

8:15 p.m.:  Norman Gaboriault made a motion to adjourn.  Seconded by Paul Prue.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley.

 

TOWN OF DERBY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

Conditional Use Review

Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law & Decision

September 21, 2009

 

OWNER: Julie Bronson

MEETING DATE: September 21, 2009

APPLICATION #: 09-115

 

This decision pertains to Conditional Use review for application #09-115 by Julie Bronson, PIN #PATST003A6L13, for a 13 ft by 19 ft sunroom addition to a nonconforming single-family dwelling.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT

 

Based upon the information contained in the exhibits for this application (see attached list) and the evidence presented at the Zoning Board of Adjustment hearing on September 21, 2009 the Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment makes the following Findings of Fact:

 

General Information

  1. The property is owned by Julie Bronson
  2. The property is located at 315 Dashner Circle and is in a Village Residential-One Derby Line (VR-1/DL) zoning district.
  3. The lot is .38 ac with 282 ft of road frontage.
  4. The existing single-family dwelling, with a 12 ft rear setback, is a nonconforming structure due to an error by the zoning administrator in issuing permit #05-064.

 

This Application

  1. The proposed 13 ft by 19 ft sunroom is to be 14 ft from the rear lot line.
  2. The existing dwelling is 12 ft from the rear lot line.
  3. The rear yard setback for the VR-1/DL zoning district is 25 ft.
  4. §302.5 allows for the expansion of single-family nonconforming structures with conditional use approval provided that the expansion does not increase the extent of the existing nonconformity regarding setbacks or other bylaw requirements.
  5. The neighborhood consists of single-family dwellings and there is open farmland to the west along the rear lot line of the Bronson property.
  6. There will be minimal traffic generate from this project.
  7. Water/sewer will not be affected by this project.
  8. There are no renewable energy resources in close proximity to this property.

 

CONCLUSION OF LAW

 

Based on the foregoing Finding of Fact, the Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment concludes that the proposed site plan provides:

 

1.) The capacity of existing or planned community facilities;

This project will not have an undue adverse impact on existing or planned community facilities.

2.) The character of the area affected, as defined by the purpose or purposes of the zoning district within which the project is located, and specifically stated policies and standards of the municipal plan;

This will not have an undue adverse impact on the character of the area.

3.) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity;

This project will not have an undue adverse impact on the roads and highways in the vicinity.

4.) Bylaws and ordinances then in effect;

A portion of the proposed sunroom will be within the required rear yard setback area and this will increase the extent of the existing noncomformity.

5.) Utilization of renewable energy resources;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the utilization of renewable energy resources.

6.) The general public health, safety and welfare;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the general public health, safety and welfare.

 

 


 

DECISION

 

The Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment, based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law, hereby DENIES application #09-115 by Julie Bronson, PIN #PATST003A6L13, for a 13 ft by 19 ft sunroom with a 14 ft rear yard setback because §302 of the Derby Zoning Bylaw does not allow for the expansion of the footprint of a nonconforming structure within any required setback area.

 

 

Those in favor: Joe Profera, Paul Prue, Judy Nommik, Norman Gaboriault.

 

Those in opposition: None.

 

Dated in Derby, Vermont this 21st day of September 2009.

 

Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment

 

Joe Profera, Chair                                                                                

 

An interested person who has participated in the municipal regulatory proceeding may appeal the decision rendered in that proceeding by the Appropriate Municipal Panel to Environmental Court in Accordance with 24 VSA, Chapter 117, §4471, in writing, within 30 days of the date of such decision.  The fee is $250.

 

If you fail to appeal a decision, your right to challenge the decision at some future time may be lost because you waited to long.  You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §4472(d).

 

This is a local permit application only.  Other permits may be NECESSARY.  The applicant is responsible for insuring compliance with all applicable State and Federal regulations pertaining to this application.  To determine if other permits are required you should contact the State Regional Permit Specialist at (802) 476-0195 and the State Dept. of Labor and Industry at (802) 828-5098.

 

 

EXHIBIT LIST

 

 

Applicant

Date

Description

A-1

8/31/2009

Application

A-2

8/31/2009

Site plan

A-3

8/31/2009

Abutters list

 

 

 

Town

Date

Description

T-1

9/1/2009

Certificate of Mailing

T-2

9/2/2009

ZA's comments

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment * Minutes * July 13, 2009

 

Members Present:  Paul Prue, Norman Gaboriault, Joe Profera, Charles Capaldi.

 

Members Absent:  Judy Nommik.

 

Others Present:  Tim Gustafson-Byrne, ZA Bob Kelley.

 

7:05 p.m.: Chair Joe Profera called the hearing to order.  Paul Prue made a motion to accept the minute of the last meeting (Jun 29) as written.  Seconded by Joe Profera.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

Chair Joe Profera read the warning for application 09-065 by Tim Gustafson-Byrne, PIN #RT111004G5C, for conditional use approval to expand a nonconforming structure.  It is proposed to add a 30 ft by 24 ft second story apartment about the existing garage.  This property is located at 78 VT Route 111 and is in a Village Residential/Multi-family Derby Center zoning district.  Tim Gustafson-Byrne was present to explain the request.  The bylaws have recently been changed to allow this expansion of a nonconforming structure.  The garage portion of the building will be torn down and rebuilt in the same footprint with a second floor 1-bedroom apartment.  This will add 5½ ft to the height of the existing building.  The business in the building is mainly a workshop and not really retail.  The whole building will be resided with vinyl.  There were no letters submitted or oral testimony given by abutting property owners/interested parties in regards to this application.  Norman Gaboriault made a motion to close the hearing on application 09-065 by Tim Gustafson-Byrne.  Seconded by Charles Capaldi.  Approved by a unanimous decision.  The applicant was informed that the Board has 45 days to render a decision and they will be notified when a decision has been made.

 

After deliberations Charles Capaldi made a motion to grant conditional use approval to application 09-065 by Tim Gustafson-Byrne as submitted.  Seconded by Norman Gaboriault.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

7:20 p.m.:  Charles Capaldi made a motion to adjourn.  Seconded by Paul Prue.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley.

 

TOWN OF DERBY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

Conditional Use Review

Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law & Decision

July 13, 2009

 

OWNER: Tim Gustafson-Byrne

MEETING DATE: July 13, 2009

APPLICATION #: 09-065

 

This decision pertains to Conditional Use review for application #09-065 to expand an nonconforming structure by adding a 24 ft by 30 ft second story addition for a one-bedroom apartment.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT

 

Based upon the information contained in the exhibits for this application (see attached list) and the evidence presented at the Zoning Board of Adjustment hearing on July 13, 2009 the Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment makes the following Findings of Fact:

 

General Information

  1. The property is located at 78 VT Rte 111 and is owned by Tim Gustafson-Byrne.
  2. The lot is 0.13 ac and is in the Village Residential Multi-Family Derby Center zoning district.
  3. The property is on village water and sewer.

 

This Application

  1. The existing building is nonconforming as it does not meet the front or side yard setbacks.
  2. The proposed addition will not change the footprint of the building.
  3. Additional water and sewer allocation granted from the Village.
  4. Parking access is via a private R.O.W off of Rte 111.
  5. The existing building is a single story structure and the buildings around this property are more than one story.
  6. There are no known renewable energy resources that will be affected by this project.
  7. The area is a mixture of residential and commercial uses.

 

CONCLUSION OF LAW

 

Based on the foregoing Finding of Fact, the Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment concludes that the proposed site plan provides:

 

1.) The capacity of existing or planned community facilities;

This project will not have an undue adverse impact on existing or planned community facilities.

2.) The character of the area affected, as defined by the purpose or purposes of the zoning district within which the project is located, and specifically stated policies and standards of the municipal plan;

This will not have an undue adverse impact on the character of the area.

3.) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity;

This project will not have an undue adverse impact on the roads and highways in the vicinity.

4.) Bylaws and ordinances then in effect;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the bylaw in effect.

5.) Utilization of renewable energy resources;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the utilization of renewable energy resources.

6.) The general public health, safety and welfare;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the general public health, safety and welfare.

 

 

 

 


 

DECISION

 

The Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment, based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law, hereby APPROVES application #09-065 by Tim Gustafson-Byrne for a 24 ft by 30 ft second story addition for a one-bedroom apartment as submitted.

 

 

Those in favor: Joe Profera, Paul Prue, Norman Gaboriault, Charles Capaldi.

 

Those in opposition: None.

 

Dated in Derby, Vermont July 13, 2009.

 

Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment

 

Joe Profera, Chair                                                                                

 

An interested person who has participated in the municipal regulatory proceeding may appeal the decision rendered in that proceeding by the Appropriate Municipal Panel to Environmental Court in Accordance with 24 VSA, Chapter 117, §4471, in writing, within 30 days of the date of such decision.  The fee is $250.

 

If you fail to appeal a decision, your right to challenge the decision at some future time may be lost because you waited to long.  You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §4472(d).

 

This is a local permit application only.  Other permits may be NECESSARY.  The applicant is responsible for insuring compliance with all applicable State and Federal regulations pertaining to this application.  To determine if other permits are required you should contact the State Regional Permit Specialist at (802) 476-0195 and the State Dept. of Labor and Industry at (802) 828-5098.

 

 

EXHIBIT LIST

 

 

Applicant

Date

Description

A-1

6/16/2009

Application

A-2

6/16/2009

Abutters list

A-3

6/16/2009

Narrative

A-4

6/16/2009

Elevation views

A-5

6/16/2009

Photos

A-6

6/16/2009

Tax map

A-7

6/16/2009

Listers card

A-8

6/16/2009

Survey map

A-9

6/18/2009

Site plan

 

 

 

Town

Date

Description

T-1

6/17/2009

Certificate of mailing - PC

T-2

6/18/2009

ZA's comments - PC

T-3

6/18/2009

ZA's comments - ZBA

T-4

6/24/2009

Certificate of mailing - ZBA

 

 

 

 

 



 

Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment * Minutes * June 29, 2009

 

Members Present:  Paul Prue, Joe Profera, Judy Nommik.

 

Members Absent:  Norman Gaboriault, Charles Capaldi.

 

Others Present:  Bill Birch, Ben Birch.

 

7:00 p.m.: Chair Joe Profera called the hearing to order.  Judy Nommik made a motion to accept the minute of the last meeting (May 18) as written.  Seconded by Paul Prue.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

Chair Joe Profera read the warning for application 09-059 by Ted Bolognani, PIN #NOSAL004H6T, for conditional use approve to expand a nonconforming single-family dwelling by adding an 8 ft by 20 ft addition to his existing camp.  The proposed addition is to be 15 ft from both side lot lines and is no closer to the lot lines than the existing camp.  This property is located at 13 Hideaway Drive and is in a Shoreland zoning district.  Bill Birch was present to explain the request.  The proposal and restrictions on nonconforming structures were discussed.  There were no letters submitted or oral testimony given by abutting property owners/interested parties in regards to this application.  Judy Nommik made a motion to close the hearing on application 09-059 by Ted Bolognani.  Seconded by Paul Prue.  Approved by a unanimous decision. 

 

Paul Prue made a motion to deny application 09-059 by Ted Bolognani, PIN #NOSAL004H6T, for conditional use approve to expand a nonconforming single-family dwelling by adding an 8 ft by 20 ft addition to his existing camp because the proposal does not comply with all criteria (see attached written decision).  Seconded by Judy Nommik.  The application was DENIED by a unanimous decision. 

 

7:30 p.m.:  Judy Nommik made a motion to adjourn.  Seconded by Paul Prue.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

The minutes were taken by Judy Nommik.

TOWN OF DERBY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

Conditional Use Review

Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law & Decision

June 29, 2009

 

OWNER: Ted Bolognani

MEETING DATE: June 29, 2009

APPLICATION #: 09-059

 

This decision pertains to Conditional Use review for application #09-059 by Ted Bolognani, PIN NOSAL004H6T, an 8 ft by 20 ft addition to a nonconforming single-family dwelling.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT

 

Based upon the information contained in the exhibits for this application (see attached list) and the evidence presented at the Zoning Board of Adjustment hearing on June 29, 2009 the Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment makes the following Findings of Fact:

 

General Information

  1. The property is owned by Ted & Laurie Bolognani.
  2. The property is located at 13 Hideaway drive and is in the Shoreland zoning district.
  3. The lot is 0.4 ac with 50 ft of road frontage and 50 ft of lake frontage

 

This Application

  1. The existing camp has 660 sq ft of living area and is centered on the lot with a 15 ft setback on both sides.
  2. Minimum side yard setbacks for the Shoreland district is 25 ft, therefore the existing building is nonconforming.
  3. The proposed 8 ft by 20 ft addition will be on the back side of the building away from the lake and will not get any closer to the side lot lines than the existing building.
  4. The proposed addition is to increase the living area of the building.
  5. The number of bedrooms and bathrooms will not increase.
  6. The area is very congested with buildings already in close proximity to one another on undersized lots.
  7. There are no known renewable energy resources in the area.
  8. Onsite water and septic are utilized.

 

 

 

CONCLUSION OF LAW

 

Based on the foregoing Finding of Fact, the Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment concludes that the proposed site plan provides:

 

1.) The capacity of existing or planned community facilities;

This project will not have an undue adverse impact on existing or planned community facilities.

2.) The character of the area affected, as defined by the purpose or purposes of the zoning district within which the project is located, and specifically stated policies and standards of the municipal plan;

The area is already congested and this project will add to the congestion adversely affecting the character of the area.  The Town Plan section that address nonconforming structures states in part “In certain cases, it may make sense from building safety, site planning, aesthetic, transportation and or streetscape perspective to allow these buildings or sites to be substantially altered, or demolished and reconstructed to be more complying, even if not fully complying status.”  This project would make the building even more nonconforming and therefore adversely affects the Derby Town Plan.

3.) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity;

This project will not have an undue adverse impact on the roads and highways in the vicinity.

4.) Bylaws and ordinances then in effect;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the bylaw in effect.

5.) Utilization of renewable energy resources;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the utilization of renewable energy resources.

6.) The general public health, safety and welfare;

This project may have an adverse affect on public health, safety and welfare due to more intense use of the property and its close proximity to the lake. 


 

DECISION

 

The Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment, based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law, hereby DENIES application #09-059 by Ted Bolognani for an 8 ft by 20 ft addition to a nonconforming structure because the character of the area and a stated policy of the Town Plan would be adversely affected.

 

 

Those in favor: Joe Profera, Paul Prue, Judy Nommik.

 

Those in opposition: None.

 

Dated in Derby, Vermont June 29, 2009.

 

Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment

 

Joe Profera, Chair                                                                                

 

An interested person who has participated in the municipal regulatory proceeding may appeal the decision rendered in that proceeding by the Appropriate Municipal Panel to Environmental Court in Accordance with 24 VSA, Chapter 117, §4471, in writing, within 30 days of the date of such decision.  The fee is $250.

 

If you fail to appeal a decision, your right to challenge the decision at some future time may be lost because you waited to long.  You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §4472(d).

 

This is a local permit application only.  Other permits may be NECESSARY.  The applicant is responsible for insuring compliance with all applicable State and Federal regulations pertaining to this application.  To determine if other permits are required you should contact the State Regional Permit Specialist at (802) 476-0195 and the State Dept. of Labor and Industry at (802) 828-5098.

 

 

EXHIBIT LIST

 

 

Applicant

Date

Description

A-1

6/2/2009

Application

A-2

6/2/2009

Abutters list

A-3

6/2/2009

Site Plan - building renovations

A-4

6/2/2009

Site Plan - lot layout

A-5

6/2/2009

Contractors Quote

 

 

 

Town

Date

Description

T-1

6/9/2009

Certificate of mailing

T-2

6/10/2009

ZA's comments

T-3

6/17/2009

Copy of Listers' Card

T-4

6/17/2009

Copy of Zoning Map

 

 

 



 

Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment * Minutes * May 18, 2009

 

Members Present:  Paul Prue, Norman Gaboriault, Joe Profera, Judy Nommik, Charles Capaldi.

 

Members Absent:  None.

 

Others Present:  ZA Bob Kelley, Keith Beadle (Derby Line Trustee), Roland Roy (Derby Line Trustee), Bill Simendinger (representative for Main Street Place, LLC), Frank Davis, Joseph Gresser, Denis Ducharme, Laura Carpenter, Jeanne Macbeth, Jeff Simendinger, Jim Torrisi

 

7:07 p.m.:  Chairman Joe Profera called the hearing to order.  Paul Prue made a motion to accept the minutes of the last meeting (May 4th) as written.  Charles Capaldi seconded the motion.  Approved by unanimous decision.

 

Chairman Joe Profera read the warning for the appeal filed by the trustees of the Village of Derby Line on April 28, 2009 on a permit issued by Zoning Administrator Bob Kelley to raze all structures and level the sites located at 50 and 58 Main Street, pursuant to application 09-031 submitted by Main Street Place, LLC, PIN MSTDL011A6L and MSTDL013A6L.  Mr. Bill Simendinger was present to represent the interests of Main Street Place, LLC, the owner of both properties.  Mr. Simendinger testified that razing the buildings was the safest thing to do since they were in a serious state of disrepair.

 

Mr. Keith Beadle testified that the Village of Derby Line Trustees appealed the issuance of this permit on the grounds that these buildings were of historic value.  He specifically cited a potato whiskey distillery that had been built in 1805.  Mr. Simendinger indicated that the distillery had collapsed and was nothing more than a pile of lumber.  Neither of the buildings are on the National Register of Historic Places and no efforts have been made to conserve them previous to this hearing.  Mr. Beadle testified that allowing the demolition of these buildings prevents the Village of Derby Line from re-establishing its Business District.  He also raised concerns about sewer and water fees and indicated that the trustees believed that the demolition of the buildings was in violation of the proposed 2010 Town plan.  The demolition of the buildings is not in violation of the current town plan that was recently readopted, pending approval of the proposed 2010 town plan.  Mr. Beadle indicated that Customs and Border Patrol were “concerned with people pulling in to a business before checking in with Customs.”  Customs and Border Patrol were aware of the hearing but were not represented.  Mr. Beadle expressed the trustees’ concern that if the buildings are razed, the Village will end up with vacant lots because the proposed uses might not pass the Act 250 test.  Mr. Beadle expressed concern that the Village of Derby Line trustees did not find out about the issuance of the demolition permit until 2 hours before the appeal deadline.  Mr. Simendinger suggested that if the Village Trustees had not received appropriate notice, the appeal itself might be invalid.  Mr. Beadle also said that the Village Trustees might not have objected if they had some idea of what was going to be built in place of the two buildings.

 

Mr. Simendinger clearly stated that he was uncomfortable saying anything or speculating about what business and structures would be constructed at the location in question.  “Whatever is proposed will be something you want,” he said.  He cited the Vermont Supreme Court case of Rosetti versus Chittenden County and indicated that it is unlikely that the Zoning Administrator’s decision could be overturned by the ZBA and hold up in court.  He indicated that the Town Plan was very vague but that the Village of Derby Line is very green, that the area in question is very “decrepit” and that the customers of any eventual business would be Canadians.  Mr. Simendinger contended that this was a zoning permit for a specific use – to raze the buildings.  Main Street, LLC has discussed trading buildings with Customs, but no final decision has been reached.  When asked, Mr. Simendinger indicated that there were 9 residential apartments in one of the buildings, and that the storefronts included a customs broker, a beauty salon and a DHL office.  The other building stands vacant. 

 

Comments from the public:  Mr. Frank Davis, a resident of the Village of Derby Line, expressed his desire to be granted interested party status as a village resident, not as an abutter.  Mr. Davis pointed out that while the current town plan may not specifically prohibit the razing of the buildings, the 2010 town plan may very well prevent the construction of new buildings if they are out of character.  He also said that on a personal note, he’s not sorry to see the buildings come down, but he wants to see something in line with the character of the buildings in Derby Line, not something with steel, chrome and neon lights.  Since the new construction would be replacing both residences and storefronts which are a long-standing tradition in the area and part of the character of downtown Derby Line.  Mr. Davis also stated that there are other buildings further north – specifically, the Caswell Building, an apartment house and a private residence.  Mr. Jim Torrisi asked if there was a connection between the issue of granting a permit to raze the buildings and a subsequent permit to build?  There is no such connection.  Denis Ducharme asked if anybody was going to give the owners the money necessary to fix these buildings up since there was so much discussion about a historic district.  Mr. Simendinger said that he didn’t think there were any funds available.

 

Chairman Joe Profera provided everyone present with an opportunity task any final questions.  Charles Capaldi asked if anyone had been granted interested party status in this matter.  Bob Kelley indicated that only the Village of Derby Line Trustees had filed for party status, but that anyone could request it.  Frank Davis reiterated a request to be granted interested party status as a resident of the village, not as an abutter

 

Charles Capaldi moved that the Board close the hearing and go into deliberative session on the above appeal.  Seconded by Judy Nommik.  Approved by unanimous decision.  The Board has 45 days to render a decision and proper notification will be made when their decision is made.

 

The Board moved into deliberative session.

 

Judy Nommik made a motion to come out of deliberative session, seconded by Norman Gaboriault.  Approved by unanimous decision. 

 

The Board found that the buildings are not in a designated historic district and that the permit is compliant with the current zoning bylaw and the current Town Plan.  Norman Gaboriault made a motion that the Zoning Board of Adjustment find that the zoning permit was properly issued by the Zoning Administrator to raze the buildings located at 50 and 58 Main Street in Derby Line and that the appeal therefore be denied.  Judy Nommik seconded the motion.  Approved by unanimous decision

 

8:20 p.m.:  Norman Gaboriault made a motion to adjourn.  Judy Nommik seconded the motion.  Approved by unanimous decision.

 

The minutes were taken by Charles Capaldi.



 

 

Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment * Minutes * May 4, 2009

 

Members Present:  Paul Prue, Norman Gaboriault, Charles Capaldi.

 

Members Absent:  Joe Profera, Judy Nommik.

 

Others Present:  Reginald Abbott, Laura Suchla, ZA Bob Kelley.

 

7:25 p.m.: Acting Chair Paul Prue called the hearing to order.  Norman Gaboriault made a motion to accept the minute of the last meeting (Dec 1) as written.  Seconded by Charles Capaldi.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

Acting Chair Paul Prue read the warning for application 09-035 by Reginald Abbott, PIN TRD41001G3.T, for conditional use approval to expand a nonconforming single-family dwelling by adding a 2 ft by 24 ft addition to square up the building and relocating a previously approved addition 2 ft closer to Crawford Road to be in line with the existing building.  The existing building is approximately 16 ft from the Crawford Farm Road and the proposed addition will not get any closer to the road.  This property is located at 30 Crawford Farm Road and is in a Commercial zoning district.  Mr. Abbott and Ms. Suchla were present to explain the request.  Mr. Abbott explained that the porch on the building was in dire need of repair and it made more sense to tear it down and rebuild it, rather than trying to repair it.  The minor addition he is proposing is to simply square up the building.  There were no comments from the public.  Paul Prue made a motion to close the hearing on application 09-035 by Reginald Abbott.  Seconded by Norman Gaboriault.  Approved by a unanimous decision.  The applicant was informed that the Board has 45 days to render a decision and they will be notified when a decision has been made.

 

The election for ZBA officers was tabled until the board’s next meeting.

 

The board went into deliberative session on the above application.

 

Upon returning from deliberative session Charles Capaldi made a motion to grant conditional use approve to application 09-035 by Reginald Abbott as submitted (see attached written decision).  Seconded by Norman Gaboriault.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

7:45 p.m.:  Norman Gaboriault made a motion to adjourn.  Seconded by Charles Capaldi.  Approved by a unanimous decision.

 

The minutes were taken by Bob Kelley.

 

TOWN OF DERBY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

Conditional Use Review

Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law & Decision

May 4, 2009

 

OWNER: Reginald Abbott

MEETING DATE: May 4, 2009

APPLICATION #: 09-035

 

This decision pertains to Conditional Use review for application #09-035 by Reginald Abbott to expand an nonconforming single-family dwelling by adding a 2 ft by 24 ft addition to square up the building and relocating a previously approved addition 2 ft closer to Crawford Road to be in line with the existing building. 

 

FINDINGS OF FACT

 

Based upon the information contained in the exhibits for this application (see attached list) and the evidence presented at the Zoning Board of Adjustment hearing on May 4, 2009 the Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment makes the following Findings of Fact:

 

General Information

  1. The property is owned by Reginald Abbott.
  2. The property is located at 30 Crawford Road and is in a Commercial zoning district.
  3. The lot is approximately .38 acres with over 200 ft of road frontage.

 

This Application

  1. The existing use of the building is as a single-family dwelling.
  2. The existing building is approximately 16 ft from Crawford Road.
  3. The setback for the Commercial zoning district is 25 ft.
  4. The building predates zoning and is nonconforming.
  5. §302.5 of the bylaw establishes procedures to allow for the expansion of a nonconforming single-family dwelling.
  6. The property is located along Rte 5 and Crawford Rd with access only from Crawford Rd.
  7. No addition water or sewer is being requested.
  8. The area is predominately commercial uses with some residential uses further up Crawford Rd.
  9. Additional traffic generate by this project will be minimal.
  10. There are no known renewable energy resources that will be affected.

 

CONCLUSION OF LAW

 

Based on the foregoing Finding of Fact, the Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment concludes that the proposed site plan provides:

 

1.) The capacity of existing or planned community facilities;

This project will not have an undue adverse impact on existing or planned community facilities.

2.) The character of the area affected, as defined by the purpose or purposes of the zoning district within which the project is located, and specifically stated policies and standards of the municipal plan;

This will not have an undue adverse impact on the character of the area.

3.) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity;

This project will not have an undue adverse impact on the roads and highways in the vicinity.

4.) Bylaws and ordinances then in effect;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the bylaw in effect.

5.) Utilization of renewable energy resources;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the utilization of renewable energy resources.

6.) The general public health, safety and welfare;

This project will not have an undue adverse effect on the general public health, safety and welfare.

 

 

 

 


 

DECISION

 

The Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment, based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law, hereby APPROVES application #09-035 by Reginald Abbott to add a 2 ft by 24 ft addition to square up the building and relocate a previously approved addition 2 ft closer to Crawford Road to be in line with the existing building as submitted.

 

 

Those in favor: Paul Prue, Norman Gaboriault, Charles Capaldi.

 

Those in opposition: None.

 

Dated in Derby, Vermont May 4, 2009.

 

Town of Derby Zoning Board of Adjustment

 

Paul Prue, Acting Chair                                                                      

 

An interested person who has participated in the municipal regulatory proceeding may appeal the decision rendered in that proceeding by the Appropriate Municipal Panel to Environmental Court in Accordance with 24 VSA, Chapter 117, §4471, in writing, within 30 days of the date of such decision.  The fee is $250.

 

If you fail to appeal a decision, your right to challenge the decision at some future time may be lost because you waited to long.  You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §4472(d).

 

This is a local permit application only.  Other permits may be NECESSARY.  The applicant is responsible for insuring compliance with all applicable State and Federal regulations pertaining to this application.  To determine if other permits are required you should contact the State Regional Permit Specialist at (802) 476-0195 and the State Dept. of Labor and Industry at (802) 828-5098.

 

 

EXHIBIT LIST

 

 

Applicant

Date

Description

A-1

4/15/2009

Application

A-2

4/15/2009

Abutters list

A-3

4/15/2009

Overall site plan

A-4

4/15/2009

Building close-up site plan

 

 

 

Town

Date

Description

T-1

4/16/2009

Certificate of mailing

T-2

4/16/2009

ZA's comments